Journal: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

Article Title: Measurement of dynamic pupillometry parameters in adult Indian population

doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_953_23

Figure Lengend Snippet: Summary of previous articles

Article Snippet: Tekin et al .[ ] (2018), Turkey , Total- 155 Male- 69 Female- 86 Age: 6–64 years , MonPack One, Vision Monitor System (Metrovision, Perenchies, France) , White light flashes used with stimulus- 200 ms High-resolution camera (880 nm) with 30 images of both the eyes recorded per second Total luminance- 100 cd/m 2 Total intensity- 20 lux Only data from right eyes was analyzed , Static pupillometry measurements include: Scotopic PD- 0.1 cd/m 2 , Mesopic PD- 1 cd/m 2 , Low photopic PD- 10 cd/m 2 , High photopic PD- 100 cd/m 2 Dynamic pupillometry measurements recorded after 5 min of dark adaptation include: resting diameter, amplitude of pupil contraction, latency of pupil contraction and dilation, duration of pupil contraction and dilation, velocity of pupil contraction and dilation , Statistically significant ( P <0.001) correlation of all static pupil diameters with age (inversely correlated with age) Latency of pupil contraction- positively correlated with age Amplitude and duration of pupil contraction, latency, and duration of pupil dilation- not statistically significantly correlated with age No significant variation between males and females.

Techniques: Sampling

Journal: Journal of Current Ophthalmology

Article Title: Comparison of Two Different Contrast Sensitivity Testing Methods in Patients with Low Vision

doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_147_21

Figure Lengend Snippet: Median values of logCS for Vector vision-standardized contrast sensitivity test (CSV-1000E) and Metrovision Monpack 3 contrast sensitivity test

Article Snippet: All participants were tested first with CSV-1000E and then with Metrovision MonPack 3.

Techniques: Plasmid Preparation

Journal: Journal of Current Ophthalmology

Article Title: Comparison of Two Different Contrast Sensitivity Testing Methods in Patients with Low Vision

doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_147_21

Figure Lengend Snippet: Maximum, median, and minimum logCS values obtained from the Metrovision Monpack 3 test. The maximum, median, and minimum logCS values at 0.5, 1.5, 3, and 6 cycles per degree (cpd) spatial frequencies for the Metrovision Monpack 3 test. The peak for the Metrovision Monpack 3 test was observed at 1.5 cpd

Article Snippet: All participants were tested first with CSV-1000E and then with Metrovision MonPack 3.

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Current Ophthalmology

Article Title: Comparison of Two Different Contrast Sensitivity Testing Methods in Patients with Low Vision

doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_147_21

Figure Lengend Snippet: The index of contrast sensitivity (ICS) score distribution in Metrovision Monpack 3 test. The distribution of ICS scores in the tested frequencies are shown for Metrovision Monpack 3. ICS is defined as the sum of residual differences (positive or negative) from the median contrast sensitivity value for each frequency.

Article Snippet: All participants were tested first with CSV-1000E and then with Metrovision MonPack 3.

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Current Ophthalmology

Article Title: Comparison of Two Different Contrast Sensitivity Testing Methods in Patients with Low Vision

doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_147_21

Figure Lengend Snippet: Index of contrast sensitivity scores in percentiles for Vector vision-standardized contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000E) and Metrovision Monpack 3 contrast sensitivity tests

Article Snippet: All participants were tested first with CSV-1000E and then with Metrovision MonPack 3.

Techniques: Plasmid Preparation, Standard Deviation

Journal: Journal of Current Ophthalmology

Article Title: Comparison of Two Different Contrast Sensitivity Testing Methods in Patients with Low Vision

doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_147_21

Figure Lengend Snippet: The index of contrast sensitivity (ICS) score averages and differences of Vector vision-standardized contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000E) and Metrovision Monpack 3 tests in the Bland–Altman scatter plot. The mean values and differences between the two contrast sensitivity test measurements were found to be within the values that could be considered compatible for limits of agreement

Article Snippet: All participants were tested first with CSV-1000E and then with Metrovision MonPack 3.

Techniques: Plasmid Preparation

Journal: Journal of Current Ophthalmology

Article Title: Comparison of Two Different Contrast Sensitivity Testing Methods in Patients with Low Vision

doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_147_21

Figure Lengend Snippet: Median values of logCS for Vector vision-standardized contrast sensitivity test (CSV-1000E) and Metrovision Monpack 3 contrast sensitivity test

Article Snippet: The 1.5 and 6 cpd frequencies in CSV-1000E and the 0.5 and 3 cpd frequencies in the Metrovision MonPack 3 test received factor 2.

Techniques: Plasmid Preparation

Journal: Journal of Current Ophthalmology

Article Title: Comparison of Two Different Contrast Sensitivity Testing Methods in Patients with Low Vision

doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_147_21

Figure Lengend Snippet: Maximum, median, and minimum logCS values obtained from the Metrovision Monpack 3 test. The maximum, median, and minimum logCS values at 0.5, 1.5, 3, and 6 cycles per degree (cpd) spatial frequencies for the Metrovision Monpack 3 test. The peak for the Metrovision Monpack 3 test was observed at 1.5 cpd

Article Snippet: The 1.5 and 6 cpd frequencies in CSV-1000E and the 0.5 and 3 cpd frequencies in the Metrovision MonPack 3 test received factor 2.

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Current Ophthalmology

Article Title: Comparison of Two Different Contrast Sensitivity Testing Methods in Patients with Low Vision

doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_147_21

Figure Lengend Snippet: The index of contrast sensitivity (ICS) score distribution in Metrovision Monpack 3 test. The distribution of ICS scores in the tested frequencies are shown for Metrovision Monpack 3. ICS is defined as the sum of residual differences (positive or negative) from the median contrast sensitivity value for each frequency.

Article Snippet: The 1.5 and 6 cpd frequencies in CSV-1000E and the 0.5 and 3 cpd frequencies in the Metrovision MonPack 3 test received factor 2.

Techniques:

Journal: Journal of Current Ophthalmology

Article Title: Comparison of Two Different Contrast Sensitivity Testing Methods in Patients with Low Vision

doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_147_21

Figure Lengend Snippet: Index of contrast sensitivity scores in percentiles for Vector vision-standardized contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000E) and Metrovision Monpack 3 contrast sensitivity tests

Article Snippet: The 1.5 and 6 cpd frequencies in CSV-1000E and the 0.5 and 3 cpd frequencies in the Metrovision MonPack 3 test received factor 2.

Techniques: Plasmid Preparation, Standard Deviation

Journal: Journal of Current Ophthalmology

Article Title: Comparison of Two Different Contrast Sensitivity Testing Methods in Patients with Low Vision

doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_147_21

Figure Lengend Snippet: The index of contrast sensitivity (ICS) score averages and differences of Vector vision-standardized contrast sensitivity (CSV-1000E) and Metrovision Monpack 3 tests in the Bland–Altman scatter plot. The mean values and differences between the two contrast sensitivity test measurements were found to be within the values that could be considered compatible for limits of agreement

Article Snippet: The 1.5 and 6 cpd frequencies in CSV-1000E and the 0.5 and 3 cpd frequencies in the Metrovision MonPack 3 test received factor 2.

Techniques: Plasmid Preparation